I like this distinction thanks. Another thought I had is that problems that are easy for humans are easy for LLMs, and problems that are hard for humans are hard for LLMs. That contrasts with other ML models like chess players, and also in general, computer programs that can do things humans can't do.
I like this distinction thanks. Another thought I had is that problems that are easy for humans are easy for LLMs, and problems that are hard for humans are hard for LLMs. That contrasts with other ML models like chess players, and also in general, computer programs that can do things humans can't do.
I like this distinction thanks. Another thought I had is that problems that are easy for humans are easy for LLMs, and problems that are hard for humans are hard for LLMs. That contrasts with other ML models like chess players, and also in general, computer programs that can do things humans can't do.